Your discussion and conclusions sections should answer the question:What do your results mean? Show In other words, the majority of the Discussion and Conclusions sections should be an interpretation of your results. You should: Discuss your conclusions in order of most to least
important. Example Discussion ...In the present study, we also used a more sensitive test of improvement in model discrimination [27]. We found that the addition of NT-proBNP to the APACHE II score significantly increased the ability to predict ICU mortality as demonstrated by the IDI (6.6%, P = 0.003) and NRI (16.6%, P = 0.007) indices. NT-proBNP was not an independent predictor of ICU mortality in the non-cardiac subgroup after adjustment for APACHE II score and CRP. Kotanidou et al. [13] found that NT-proBNP predicted mortality independently after the adjusted APACHE II score and some inflammatory cytokines levels in non-cardiac ICU patients. But they used TNF-a, IL-6, and IL-10 rather than CRP and enrolled many surgical and multiple trauma cases. In the cardiac subgroup, NT-proBNP independently predicted ICU mortality while the AUC of the APACHE II score was not different from that of NT-proBNP (0.81 ± 0.03 vs 0.77 ± 0.04; P > 0.05). The addition of NT-proBNP to the APACHE-II score can obviously increase predictive ability (IDI = 10.2%, P = 0.018; NRI = 18.5%, P = 0.028). Therefore, although NT-proBNP could predict ICU mortality in unselected medical patents, it appeared to be more useful in cardiac patients than in non-cardiac patients. ...One previous study showed no predictive value of CRP for in-hospital mortality, even in univariate analysis [21]. The scope of the study was rather small (N = 103) and, thus, the statistical power was less than that of our study. Moreover, the endpoint of the previous study was in-hospital mortality but not ICU mortality. The present study revealed that CRP was also an independent predictor of ICU mortality in unselected patients or non-cardiac patients... Several limitations of our study should be mentioned. First, neither echocardiography was performed nor cardiac function assessed in the present study. The division of subgroups was according to primary admission cause. Thus patients in the non-cardiac group may also have cardiac disease and cardiac dysfunction. However, patients with cardiac diseases as the primary principal diagnosis leading to ICU admission must have cardiac diseases. The statistical conclusion drawn from the cardiac group was appropriate. Second, this was a single-center study, and participants did not include surgery and trauma patients. The value for NT-proBNP in prediction of adverse outcome would be a bit different if the population was different. At last, a limitation of the net reclassification improvement and other reclassification measures is that they depend on the particular categories used [26]. We had used < 10%, 10% to 30%, and 30% to 50%, and > 50% for the risk of ICU death as risk categories. But there are still no well-recognized risk categories now. If the risk categories used had been different, the NRI would be a bit different. Conclusions How do you write a discussion and conclusion for a research paper?Snippets of Effective Discussions:. Summarize the key findings in clear and concise language. ... . Acknowledge when a hypothesis may be incorrect. ... . Place your study within the context of previous studies. ... . Discuss potential future research. ... . Provide the reader with a “take-away” statement to end the manuscript.. What is discussion in research paper example?The discussion section is one of the final parts of a research paper, in which an author describes, analyzes, and interprets their findings. They explain the significance of those results and tie everything back to the research question(s).
What is an example of a discussion?An example of a discussion is when two or more people disagree and decide to sit down and talk out their different opinions. Conversation or debate concerning a particular topic. There was then a long discussion of whether to capitalize words like "east". This topic is not open to discussion.
What is conclusion and discussion in research report?Your Discussion and Conclusions sections should answer the question: What do your results mean? In other words, the majority of the Discussion and Conclusions sections should be an interpretation of your results. You should: Discuss your conclusions in order of most to least important.
|